Суд признал участниц Pussy Riot виновными в хулиганстве

Ранее в ходе прений сторон прокурор просил признать подсудимых виновными в "хулиганстве по мотивам религиозной ненависти и вражды" и назначить каждой наказание в виде 3 лет заключения в колонии общего режима.

 

Все, сейчас только срок скажут.

Во-1х, линк кривой

У меня нормально открывается.

 

из морга?

Из морга такие экстремистские странички не открываются :huh:

Вот прямая ссылка, наслаждайтесь :supdup: http://synonblog.dailymail.co.uk/2012/08/p...y-european.html (тоже самое без #comments)

Наверное, самая смешная иллюстрация к подтопику. Случайно вспомнил про этот. Умение читать по-английски маст. :)

Кавказ-что-то отсюда открывается. ; )

Во-1х, линк кривой

У меня нормально открывается.

 

из морга?

Из морга такие экстремистские странички не открываются :huh:

Как бы у меня открывается... Именно эта ссыла

http://synonblog.dailymail.co.uk/2012/08/p...y-european.html

Видимо, как всегда, чё та делаю неправильна... :hmm:

ПыСы. Кажется знаю чо, но это в ГСИ.

Вот прямая ссылка, наслаждайтесь :supdup: http://synonblog.dailymail.co.uk/2012/08/p...y-european.html

Ты ее уже давал :bayan:

Не пускают :pop:

Вот прямая ссылка, наслаждайтесь :supdup: http://synonblog.dailymail.co.uk/2012/08/p...y-european.html

Ты ее уже давал :bayan:

Не пускают :pop:

Он её исправил. Он внутристраничный анкор стер (линк на). Тот самый, который у меня уже удален на скриншотах. ; )

 

Все, я в офф, а то до утра не доживу. :) Не в том суть, как достучаться. ; )

Это профессиональные провокаторы от нашистов, наркоманы бывшие.

Видео аж 42 минуты, лень смотреть. Что там вкратце?

Посмотрел, не пожалел время... Жаль, что майка была одета не на мне в тот момент. Ребятишки очень напоминают гитлерюгенд 30-х годов..

Ребятишки очень напоминают гитлерюгенд 30-х годов..

Вот это память :).

А то! :rolleyes:

из морга?

Да. Пробовал из морга, из штатов в корпоративной сети и из дома. Везде открывается нормально.

 

Из морга такие экстремистские странички не открываются :huh:

Эта конкретно открывается. По крайней мере с моего компа в морге.

 

Значит, у меня гуано вместо интернета

 

 

 

 

 

Значит, ....

:) Все гораздо веселее.

Значит, у меня гуано вместо интернета

...

Приведенная цитата страдает легкой неадекватностью. По замыслу автора блога, его мысленному эксперименту, ирландские Пусси Райот протестуют против ирландского правительства и идут выступать в мечеть (Imagine they are opposed to present Government policy which .... Active in their political ‘collective,’ the three young women announce they are a band. They burst into the mosque at Clonskeagh. They rush to the mihrab, the niche indicating the direction of Mecca, ....). Видимо, это как раз о чем-то сугубо европейском, мы все знаем, что мечеть является типичным для Европы и европейца местом отправления религиозных культов. И, конечно, для ирландцев.

В этом месте возникает дежавю и взгляд ищет подпись автора - а её нет. Ники в комментах есть, а ника автора этого письма в редакцию нет. :)

 

Какую роль играет поток сознания касательно дело Бо Силая, я понять не смог. Трехкомпонентный динамит против России США-ЕС-Китай оценил. Для безымянного ирландца (?) тема врагов России раскрыта креативно. :)

 

20 August 2012 11:26 AM

Pussy Riot prosecution: how perfectly European

 

This is my column from Monday's Irish Daily Mail ---

 

Pussy Riot: you've read about them, the Russian girl-band convicted last week after their protest against President Putin in a Moscow cathedral. Cue outrage from Amnesty International and the rest of the usual protestors.

 

But try it this way.Try it with three young Irish women instead of three young Russian women.

 

Imagine they are opposed to present Government policy which allows large-scale Muslim immigration into this country.

 

Active in their political ‘collective,’ the three young women announce they are a band. They burst into the mosque at Clonskeagh. They rush to the mihrab, the niche indicating the direction of Mecca, and roar out a song that attacks our Government leadership, blasphemes and abuses the Islamic faith, and deeply insults believers.

 

The Imam calls the police.

 

Result? Well, the first result is that the same people who are rushing to condemn the prosecution of Pussy Riot for their protest at the altar of the Cathedral of Christ the Saviour in Moscow would be demanding the prosecution of this lot of women in Clonskeagh.

 

Under Irish law, Clonskeagh Pussy Riot could face criminal prosecution for ‘incitement to hatred.’ The law says they would face trial in a district court, where they would have no right to a jury. On conviction, their punishment could be a sentence of up to two years in prison.

 

Under Russian law, Moscow Pussy Riot faced criminal prosecution for a charge based on ‘religious hatred.’ The law made them face trial in a court where they had no right to a jury. Following their conviction on Friday, their punishment was a sentence of two years in prison.

 

Yet immediately politicians across the European Union such as Angela Merkel announced that the judgment was ‘not compatible with the European values of democracy and the rule of law.’

 

The evidence indicates otherwise. The Moscow judgment is right in line with the judgment Irish law – and the laws of several other EU countries -- would allow in similar circumstances.

 

Meanwhile Mrs Merkel’s country has a law on its books which allows German courts to sentence someone to prison for up to two years if he argues that significantly fewer than six million Jews perished under Hitler.

 

It is the law against so-called ‘Holocaust denial,’ and it is well out of line with the principle of the freedom of speech.

 

Or do I have to go over it again? Possibly so: the freedom of speech has to cover the freedom to be both obnoxious and wrong, or it is no freedom at all.

 

Which brings us back to Vladimir Putin, Pussy Riot and their trial. President Putin is being attacked because of this trial in an extraordinary way. Here is why it is extraordinary.

 

Think back to August 9th, when Gu Kailai, the wife of former Chinese Communist big-shot Bo Xilai, appeared at her trial in the city of Hefei, in the east of China. She was accused of the murder of Neil Heywood, a British businessman.

 

I say she ‘appeared’ at her trial, but no foreign news organisations were allowed in the courtroom, so we don’t know if the defendant was actually in the court at all. According to a report in the Financial Times, ‘two security experts familiar with facial recognition software said the person shown in state television footage of the courtroom was not Ms Gu.’

 

Whoever was in court or not, the trial lasted less than eight hours. But then, before the trial even started, the state-controlled media reported that prosecutors had ‘irrefutable evidence’ against Gu Kailai. Later the state claimed she had confessed to the crime.

 

All wrapped up, so.

 

You have to wonder what took the full eight hours in the closed court room. Maybe they all just watched the clock to make up a full working day, so that the state-owned press could then praise the trial as ‘a model of openness.’

 

The verdict is due to be announced this morning. The chances of an acquittal are, as they say in Texas, ‘slim to zero, and Slim just left town.’ Madame Gu will be imprisoned for life if she’s lucky, executed if she’s not.

 

Yet somehow the same people who are howling about the conviction and two-year sentencing of Pussy Riot aren’t out there protesting that Madame Gu is being lynched by the totalitarian thugs of the Chinese Communist state.

 

Why not? Because Mr Putin is the unfashionable sort of totalitarian thug and the Chinese Communists are not.

 

Except of course Mr Putin had to stand for election before he became president. Was the election bent? Of course. But no one doubts he has huge popular support in Russia.

 

Anyway, the European leaders who are so ‘shocked’ by the Pussy Riot prosecution are perfectly comfortable dealing with dictatorial regimes – Saudi Arabia, for example -- that make Russia look like a Jeffersonian republic.

 

As for the Chinese dictatorial regime in particular, one only has to recall the fawning our Taoiseach did during the visit to Ireland in February of Xi Jinping, the so-called ‘supreme leader-in-waiting’ (or to be precise, unelected single-party oligarch-in-waiting), to see how comfortable our Government is with totalitarian thugs.

 

Just offer Fine Gael and Labour the chance of some Chinese investment, and they will overlook rigged Chinese courts and the way prisoners in Chinese jails are executed for purposes of organ harvesting.

 

Meanwhile, the protestors in Ireland who are attacking the Pussy Riot prosecution are perfectly comfortable looking away from show trials in dictatorial regimes – Cuba, for example – where the leadership has a history of calling around to the Havana prison to enjoy the execution of political prisoners first hand.

 

So why doesn’t Vladimir Putin get that sort of pass? Because he’s not using his thuggish power in fashionable directions.

 

Most recently, he has refused to let the United Nations Security Council back the Syrian rebels against the Assad regime.

 

Now however people are realising Mr Putin may well have been right all along to try to keep the West’s nose out of the fight in Syria. Those ‘rebels’ are looking more and more like a dangerous breed of Islamic fundamentalist. Mr Putin, who has had plenty of murderous experience with Islamic terrorists within his own borders, doesn’t want to push the national mass-butcher Assad out just so Islamic international mass-butchers can take over.

 

But the usual Irish protestors want to attack Mr Putin for more reasons than just his position on Syria, which by the way is just like Communist China’s position on Syria, but it’s Russia that is getting most kicked for resisting any kind of intervention.

 

What really puts Mr Putin out alone as a hate figure is his support for Orthodox Christianity Putin dmin Russia, and his love of his Motherland. He declares he is a believer and a patriot, and he wants the church to regain its place in Russian life and culture. He stands with millions of Russian believers who are enraged by the blasphemy of what Pussy Riot did in the cathedral.

 

More, Mr Putin wants Russia to regain its status as an influential international power. I’m with him on that one. We need Russia back in the first rank of countries for our own protection.

 

Yet three forces want to keep Russia isolated and diplomatically weak.

 

First, the American politicians who really ought to know better. They still can’t see that Russians and Soviets are not the same thing, so they still try to present Russia as a threat. It isn’t. More, it is only a strong Russia in Asia which can prevent eventual Chinese military hegemony over all of Eastern Asia—and, ultimately, over India. President Obama has been shifting US forces to Asia. America needs to make Russia an ally in that.

 

Second, the EU elite who want to pretend that they represent ‘Europe,’ so they want to denigrate the vast European state and culture of independent Russia as ‘not European.’

 

Third, China wants to keep Russia internationally weak. The Chinese calculate that one day they will want to spill their exploding population over their north-eastern border into the near-empty vastness of Russia’s eastern territory. If Russia stays militarily weak, the Chinese can get away with it.

 

And just to go back and finish with Pussy Riot: what’s wrong with the Russian prosecution is that it was prosecution for what the three women said.

 

But the fact that they did it in the Russian Orthodox cathedral was itself wrong. Political protestors have no right to crash onto other people’s altars. Or mihrabs.

 

So, a fine for disorder and trespass by Pussy Riot, yes. A prison sentence for ‘hatred,’ no. That would be far too Irish.

Значит, у меня гуано вместо интернета

...

Приведенная цитата страдает легкой неадекватностью.... В этом месте возникает дежавю и взгляд ищет подпись автора - а её нет. Ники в комментах есть, а ника автора этого письма в редакцию нет. :)

 

 

Лол ))) http://synonblog.dailymail.co.uk/2012/08/p...y-european.html :

 

MARY ELLEN SYNON

 

Mary Ellen Synon is based in Brussels as a columnist at the Irish Daily Mail and contributor to the Mail on Sunday.

 

At other times she has worked as: a columnist at the Irish Sunday Independent and the Sunday Business Post, Ireland correspondent and later Europe correspondent at the Economist, an associate producer at CBS News 60 Minutes based in London, and a reporter for the Daily Telegraph.

 

Early in her career she was awarded a travelling fellowship by the Winston Churchill Memorial Trust to allow her to study the Common Market.

А вот это видимо не по глазам ))) http://synonblog.dailymail.co.uk/2012/08/p...y-european.html :

 

MARY ELLEN SYNON

 

Mary Ellen Synon is based in Brussels as a columnist at the Irish Daily Mail and contributor to the Mail on Sunday.

 

At other times she has worked as: a columnist at the Irish Sunday Independent and the Sunday Business Post, Ireland correspondent and later Europe correspondent at the Economist, an associate producer at CBS News 60 Minutes based in London, and a reporter for the Daily Telegraph.

 

Early in her career she was awarded a travelling fellowship by the Winston Churchill Memorial Trust to allow her to study the Common Market.

Видимо, да. :)

 

Дама оказалась весьма забавной и креативной:

In the article, she wrote: 'It is time to suggest that these so-called Paralympics . . . are - well, one hesitates to say "grotesque". One will only say "perverse"…Surely physical competition is about finding the best - the fastest, strongest, highest, all that. It is not about finding someone who can wobble his way around a track in a wheelchair, or who can swim from one end of a pool to the other by Braille.'[7] She advised the disabled and blind to 'play to your competitive advantage' and added: 'In other words, Stephen Hawking shows his wisdom by staying out of the three-legged race.'

 

The article, which was criticised by the National Union of Journalists, was subsequently discussed in the Irish Senate where Maurice Hayes, a senator, director of Independent News & Media, which owns the Sunday Independent, and acquaintance of the controlling shareholder, said it was indefensible, indecent and hurtful: 'It should not have been written and if written, it should not have been published. I know that my views are shared by my colleagues on the Independent board and in particular by the chairman.' The chairman, Tony O'Reilly, and his son, Gavin O'Reilly were both attributed opinions in the matter.

 

Among other people she has criticised are the two female presidents of Ireland: 'that other ambitious small-town lady lawyer', Mary Robinson, who worked for the 'headquarters of moral corruption, the United Nations'; and the 'arrogant Mrs McAleese'.[12] She has also criticized Nicolas Sarkozy.[13]

 

Synon has also expressed admiration for the American philosopher Ayn Rand.[14] During the 2008 Presidential Election, Synon repeatedly championed Sarah Palin as the politician best suited to represent conservative values and govern the US. [15]

 

Мои извинения нетизенам за длинные цитаты без перевода, но сами цитаты появились из-за того, что не всем нетизенам удалось добраться до полного исходника, а переводить столь длинные тексты я не буду.

Все гораздо веселее.

И что же в этом весёлого?

Удивляете. :) Быстрая трасса и при этом многообразные отказы, включая 404, без связи с браузером и местными гейтами.

А вот это видимо не по глазам ))) http://synonblog.dailymail.co.uk/2012/08/p...y-european.html :

 

MARY ELLEN SYNON

 

Дама оказалась весьма забавной и креативной:

Замечательная, талантливая и очень умная женщина, с правильным пониманием процессов, текущей ситуации и жизни вообще. Когда будет русское национальное государство - обязательно пригласим её поработать корреспондентом, заодно и поучить наших журналистов.